Welcome to GraphicForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

JPG degredation

 
   Graphic Forums (Home) -> Graphic Formats RSS
Next:  Graphic Formats: PDF troubles  
Author Message
Jack

External


Since: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 3



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:55 am
Post subject: JPG degredation
Archived from groups: comp>graphics>apps>photoshop (more info?)

Hi
When saving a camera jpg file in Windows PS is there any degradation when
saving 100% or maximum quality.

Will there be a difference between saving once and saving the 10th time?

Will there be a difference when printing these pictures?

Thanks
J

 >> Stay informed about: JPG degredation 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bill Hilton

External


Since: Aug 09, 2005
Posts: 434



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 8:55 am
Post subject: Re: JPG degredation [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> Jack writes ..
>
>When saving a camera jpg file in Windows PS is there any degradation
>when saving 100% or maximum quality

Yes, it's not a lossless compression even at 100%.

>Will there be a difference between saving once and saving the 10th time?

Yes. If you start with a jpeg I'd suggest saving intermediate edits in
tiff or PSD formats, then when you're done editing if you really need a
jpeg do the conversion at that point ... constantly editing and saving
as a jpeg is not the way to go.

>Will there be a difference when printing these pictures?

Maybe ... depends on how big you print and how often you've compressed
and at what settings. A jpeg that was compressed one time at 100% and
not edited afterwards will actually print very well but the more often
you edit/save the more you'll increase the odds it will look bad with
artifacts ...

Bill

 >> Stay informed about: JPG degredation 
Back to top
Login to vote
roxy

External


Since: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 16



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 12:07 pm
Post subject: Re: JPG degredation [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I think that if you want to put your photos on the web you need to use
jpeg. I've become very fond of the "save for web" option. Your file
opens in image ready, and if you set it to 2-up, you can see your image
with the one you're saving side by side. Then you can fool around with
compression and actually see how it changes from the origional. If you
don't want to actually save for the web, just cancel, but you'll know
how much compression is acceptable to you, for printing or whatever.

Roxy
 >> Stay informed about: JPG degredation 
Back to top
Login to vote
iehsmith

External


Since: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 470



(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 3:41 pm
Post subject: Re: JPG degredation [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
iehsmith

External


Since: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 470



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 3:58 pm
Post subject: Re: JPG degredation [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Graphic Forums (Home) -> Graphic Formats All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]